A useful grammar pass separates mechanical slips from editorial choices. The first group includes accidental repeated words and misplaced spaces. The second includes decisions about rhythm, emphasis, register, and meaning. Treating every suggestion as an automatic correction can damage a good draft.

Read for one kind of problem at a time

Start with duplication. “The the sample was stored overnight” contains an obvious repeated word. But “What had had the greatest effect?” may contain an intentional construction. A rule engine can find the repetition; you still need to read the sentence.

Next inspect spacing. A space before a comma is usually a mechanical slip in ordinary English prose. Multiple spaces between words may be accidental, but in a plain-text table they may be doing layout work. DraftLens preserves newlines and offers individual edits rather than applying every rule at once.

“Could of,” “would of,” and “should of” often reflect the sound of contracted “have.” In standard edited English, “We could have finished earlier” is the expected construction.

That does not mean every occurrence of the word “of” after a nearby modal is wrong. Context matters, and quoted speech may intentionally preserve a speaker’s wording. Our local rules protect double-quoted passages rather than silently editing them.

Capitalization can be contextual

A lowercase first-person “i” is a common typing slip in English prose. Lowercase sentence openings can also be accidental. However, code, poetry, brand names, and specialist notation can intentionally depart from conventional capitalization.

Our checker is aimed at ordinary English drafts. It is not designed to rewrite code samples or enforce a universal style across dialects. If you use it on mixed-content documents, review each observation and leave intentional forms alone.

Wordiness is not the same as incorrectness

“In order to” can often become “to.” “Due to the fact that” can often become “because.” These substitutions reduce length, but they are editing suggestions, not proof of grammatical error.

Before: “The team met on a daily basis in order to review the observations.”

After: “The team met daily to review the observations.”

The shorter version keeps the central meaning in this example. In a legal, technical, or quoted passage, a similar replacement may be inappropriate. Check who does what, under which conditions, before accepting it.

The Purdue OWL concision guide provides broader examples of reducing unnecessary wording. Concision supports clarity when it preserves the information your reader needs.

Keep an undo path

A safe editing workflow makes one change, rereads the result, and allows reversal. DraftLens regenerates suggestions against the current text after each applied edit. The undo button restores the previous version. Editing the input directly clears the old report so a stale span is not treated as current evidence.

Do not assume “no matching rules” means error-free. The local checker does not provide comprehensive spelling, subject–verb agreement, style-guide enforcement, or factual review. Read the draft aloud, check names and numbers against sources, and review the final document in its intended format.

Use the grammar and clarity checker for a focused mechanical pass, then the clarity tool for conservative phrase suggestions. Your purpose and reader remain the final guides.

Put it into practice.

Take a fresh look at your draft with the related local tool.

Open grammar & clarity

Return to the writing desk · Understand our methods